🔗 Share this article

Are your LinkedIn followers viewing you as a thought leader? Do numerous respondents applauding your advice on growing your business? Are headhunters making contact to explore opportunities?

Should that not be the case, the reason could be your gender.

The Experiment: Changing Gender Identity to achieve Increased Reach

Numerous female professionals joined an organized LinkedIn experiment recently following popular discussions suggested that changing their gender to "man" boosted their platform visibility.

Some participants modified their profiles to include what they called "masculine-oriented" terminology - adding results-driven business buzzwords like "drive", "transform" and "accelerate". Based on reports, their exposure also improved.

Algorithmic Bias Questions Raised

The engagement increase has led some to speculate whether an inherent gender bias in LinkedIn's algorithm prioritizes men who use professional networking terminology.

Similar to most major social media platforms, LinkedIn utilizes a computerized system to decide which content appear to which users - promoting some while reducing others.

Company Statement

Through a blog post, LinkedIn acknowledged the phenomenon but claimed it does not factor in "demographic information" when determining post visibility. Instead, the company explained that "hundreds of signals" influence how content are received.

Changing gender on your profile does not affect how your posts appears in results or timelines.

Personal Experiences

A social media consultant, who modified her pronouns to "male pronouns" and her name to "Simon E", described remarkable results.

"The numbers I'm seeing show a sixteen-fold rise in profile views and a thirteen-fold jump in content views," she commented.

Megan Cornish, a marketing expert, started testing after observing her reach decline significantly.

The Method

• First, she changed her profile gender to "male"
• Then, she used AI tools to rewrite her profile using "masculine-oriented" wording
• Finally, she repurposed old posts with comparable "agentic" style

The outcome was instantaneous: a more than fourfold rise in visibility within one week.

The Downside

Despite the success, Cornish expressed unhappiness with the approach.

"Before, my content were softer - brief and insightful, but also friendly and human," she stated. "Currently, the bro-coded version was assertive and self-assured - like a Caucasian man being overly confident."

She discontinued the experiment after one week, stating "Each day I continued, and results improved, I became more frustrated."

Mixed Results

Some participants experienced favorable results. Cass Cooper who modified both her profile gender to "male" and her race to "white" reported a reduction in reach and interaction.

"We know there's systemic preference, but it's very challenging to comprehend how it operates in particular situations or why," she commented.

Wider Consequences

These tests occur alongside continuing conversations about LinkedIn's distinctive role as both a professional network and community site.

Recent changes in recent months have apparently caused women professionals experiencing significantly reduced exposure, resulting in informal experiments where identical content by men and women received dramatically unequal reach.

Technical Explanation

According to LinkedIn, the network uses AI systems to classify and spread content based on multiple factors, including what's shared and the user's professional identity.

The company claims it regularly evaluates its algorithms, including "checks for inequalities based on gender."

Company representative suggested that recent declines in some users' reach might originate from higher volume due to additional posts on the platform.

Evolving Environment

As one participant observed, "bro-coding" appears to be increasing on the network.

"People often view LinkedIn as more professional and polished," she remarked. "That's changing. It's turning into increasingly competitive and unpredictable."